Thursday, March 11, 2010

The Wired Word for 3/14/2010

Dear Class Member, 
Last month, the new "Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009" took effect, placing some needed limits on the rates and penalties credit card companies can impose on borrowers. The law, and the unprincipled practices of card issuers that made the law necessary, give us an opportunity to consider what the Bible has to say about "usury," which is the charging of a fee for the use of money. So that will be the topic of our next class.
 
If you wish to start thinking about our topic in advance, below is some introductory material. 
 


New Law Aims to Protect Credit Card Users
The Wired Word for March 14, 2010
 
In the News
 
On February 22, nine months after it was enacted by Congress with high bipartisan support, the "Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009" (CARD) took effect. This comprehensive credit card reform legislation is intended, in the words of the act, "to establish fair and transparent practices relating to the extension of credit under an open end consumer credit plan, and for other purposes." In short, it aims to curb unscrupulous practices by the credit card industry and to offer new protections to consumers.  
 
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner described the CARD act, which was signed into law last spring by President Obama, as "a critical step forward" in protecting the financial well-being of American families.
 
The new law includes several rules to limit how credit card companies can charge customers but does not have price controls, rate caps or fee-setting limitations. It does ban rate hikes on existing balances, calls for hard spending caps instead of over-limit fees and mandates that payments go toward high-rate balances first, thus minimizing interest charges for card users. For a quick summary of the CARD provisions, see New credit card laws 2010
 
The CARD law became necessary because of some unethical banking practices. For example, in some cases, when a person's overall credit rating went down, banks sometimes raised the interest rates they charged that customer even though the person was current and on time with payments to that card issuer. Some companies also wrote their user rules in such a way that a single late payment threw the card holder into a much higher rate bracket. Other predatory practices were sometimes embedded in legalese in the contracts the card holders were required to sign to receive the card. 
 
Although the new rules are expected to benefit card users, some of that benefit has been offset by banks that raised their interest rates and fees in the weeks before the law went into effect. While the bill was under consideration, credit card companies argued that the regulatory changes would lead to higher rates. Consumer advocacy groups point out that those same credit card companies have fulfilled their own prophecy, using their claims as cover to raise rates and find new ways to exploit their customers.
 
More on this story may be found at these links:
 
 
The Big Questions
Here are some of the questions we will discuss in class:
 
1. Almost everyone agrees that the ability to borrow money is important under certain circumstances, such as when loans allow borrowers to take advantage of significant opportunities they wouldn't be able to pursue otherwise. What guidelines help you decide when a purchase on credit is the wise thing to do?
 
2. What is a fair interest rate? At what percentage point do interest charges become unscrupulous and usurious? Explain your answer.
 
3. What cultural factors and thought processes make us as consumers prone to spend money on items we don't need and that don't move us toward our goals?  
 
4. If it is true, as most observers say, that careless spending by consumers is the chief cause of their debt, why does that not excuse those who issue credit from making as much as the market will bear?  
 
5. On what points, if any, do the principles of capitalism and the principles of Christianity disagree? On what points, if any, do they agree?
 
Confronting the News with Scripture
We will look at selected verses from these Scripture texts. You may wish to read these in advance for background:
 
Exodus 22:21-27
Nehemiah 5:1-13
Ezekiel 22:6-12
Luke 6:27-36 
Acts 4:32-37
 
In class, we will talk about these passages and look for some insight on the big questions, as well as talk about other questions you may have about this topic. Please join us.

Thursday, March 4, 2010

The Wired Word for 3/7/2010

Dear Class Member,
The news we are addressing today concerns the deaths of actor Andrew Koenig and of Marie Osmond's son, both of whom took their own lives. Suicides outnumber homicides in America, and that makes it a topic the church shouldn't overlook.
 
So suicide and the meaning of life will be the topic of our next class.
 
If you wish to start thinking about our topic in advance, below is some introductory material. 
 
 
 
 


Recent Suicides Remind Us of Life's Meaning
The Wired Word for March 7, 2010
 
In the News
 
Each year, more Americans die by suicide than by homicide.
 
We were startled to learn that, but the recent deaths of actor Andrew Koenig, 41, and Michael Blosil, 18, the son of entertainer Marie Osmond, both by their own hands, have brought that fact to the foreground.
 
Andrew Koenig, who played Richard (Boner) Stabone in the 1980s TV series Growing Pains and later appeared on Star Trek: Deep Space Nine and other series, ended his life sometime on or after February 14. His body was later found in Stanley Park in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. His father, actor Walter Koenig, said, "Our son took his own life."
 
Michael Blosil jumped to his death on February 26 from the eighth floor of his Los Angeles apartment building.
 
Both men suffered from depression, and each left a despondent note. Blosil wrote of feeling sad and friendless.
 
Michael Gerson, in his March 3 Washington Post column, writes "Suicides outnumber homicides in America, making self-hatred more lethal than violence by others." He goes on to say that in 2009, "the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration reported that 1.1 million Americans had attempted suicide during the previous year."
 
Suicide, said Gerson, is "associated with depression, feelings of hopelessness, substance abuse and low levels of serotonin in the brain."
 
After giving other statistics and perspectives on suicide, Gerson wrote that it is "often preventable," but "precisely because despair can rob individuals of judgment, it may require family and friends to intervene." This, however, is sometimes complicated by the fact that today, more Americans are likely to be isolated and live alone.
 
We recommend Gerson's column and encourage you to read it here: Pulling loved ones out of the lure of suicide. The Washington Post

More on this story can be found at these links:
 
Here are some of the questions we will discuss in class:
 
1. Given that a person who seeks to end his or her own life is often operating under a sense of despair that can distort perspective and long-range thinking, should suicide be addressed in moral terms? Why or why not?
 
2. Suicide is sometimes described as "a permanent solution to a temporary problem." What does that suggest in terms of trying to help people who are suicidal?
 
3. Under what circumstances, if any, could you conceive of suicide as a morally acceptable choice?
 
4. What does the Bible say about the meaning of life?
 
Confronting the News with Scripture
We will look at selected verses from these Scripture texts. You may wish to read these in advance for background:
 
Psalm 38:1-22
Psalm 102:1-28
Amos 9:1-4
Matthew 27:3-10 
Matthew 6:25-34
 
In class, we will talk about these passages and look for some insight on the big questions, as well as talk about other questions you may have about this topic. Please join us.


Thursday, February 25, 2010

The Wired Word for 2/28/2010

Dear Class Member,
Two recent events -- a shooting on a university campus and the flying of a plane into a public building -- appear to be anger-driven acts. Innocent people's lives were taken in both cases.
 
Those events, along with the observation by some commentators that our culture as a whole is becoming more angry, make looking at what the Bible has to say about anger a meaningful exercise. So that will be the topic of our next class.
 
If you wish to start thinking about our topic in advance, below is some introductory material. 
 
 



Anger-Driven Acts Take Innocent Lives
The Wired Word for February 28, 2010 
 
In the News
 
On February 12, Dr. Amy Bishop, a neurobiology professor at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, pulled a gun at a biology department meeting and opened fire, killing three of her fellow faculty members and wounding three others.
 
On February 18, Joseph Stack III flew his private plane into a building in Austin, Texas, that housed an office of the Internal Revenue Service. The crash caused an explosion and fire that killed one IRS employee, injured several others and ended Stack's own life.
 
The two incidents were unrelated, and the perpetrators had no known connection, yet reports of the two crimes include a common theme: anger.
 
After delving into Bishop's background, The New York Times topped an article about her with this headline: "For professor, fury just beneath the surface." Among the things the article reported about her was that "Her life seemed to veer wildly between moments of cold fury and scientific brilliance, between rage at perceived slights and empathy for her students." In the past, Bishop had shot and killed her brother (which was claimed to be an accident at the time), physically attacked a woman in a restaurant for taking the last child booster seat, and had been questioned in a mail-bomb plot against a doctor at Harvard. On another occasion, she became enraged when, on a paper she coauthored with another professor, her name appeared second.
 
The shooting at the university may have been a response to Bishop being denied tenure at the school.
 
Several reports about Bishop suggest she may have a mental disorder, but that makes her rage no less real.
 
The Times article about Stack's suicide flight into the IRS building reported that in recent weeks, his wife had complained to her parents about her husband's "increasingly frightening anger." It also said that on the night before his airplane attack, she had taken her daughter and gone to a hotel to get away from her husband. Before leaving for his flight, Stack posted online what the article called "a rant" against the government and set the family home on fire.
 
Although Stack apparently didn't have a history of rage-driven behavior, he did have a longstanding grudge against tax authorities due to personal dealings with the agency. The details of his tax circumstances haven't been reported, and it isn't known what caused him to act against the agency at this particular time.
 
Anger, a common and basic human emotion, has been a factor in many crimes throughout history. But there seems to be a growing number of anger-driven crimes to cite as examples today, especially of the kind where the perpetrator forfeits -- or at least is prepared to forfeit -- his or her own life.
 
Quite apart from criminal acts, anger also appears to be on the rise in aspects of life from how we deal with other drivers to how we view politics. One recent newspaper editorial that referred to "our increasingly angry culture" wasn't talking about crime at all but about complaints over snow plowing!  
 
No statistics are available to confirm that anger is more of a factor in life today than in the past, but plenty of examples in the news show the damage that anger-driven behavior can cause.

More on this story can be found at these links:
 
 
The Big Questions
Here are some of the questions we will discuss in class:
 
1. As long as you don't break the law, is expressing your anger, even in a way that might be considered abusive, your right?  
 
2. What is the Christian view of anger? 
 
3. Anger can be harmful, but it can also be helpful, such as when indignation motivates us to fight injustice. So how do we tell when our anger is righteous and when it isn't? Should all plans that arise from righteous anger be acted on? Why or why not? 
 
4. Because anger often has a negative effect on the ability to think clearly, what things can you do to ensure that decisions growing out of anger are appropriate and in keeping with your commitment to follow Jesus?
 
5. In "angry times," do Christians have a greater responsibility to control their anger? Why or why not?
 
Confronting the News with Scripture
We will look at selected verses from these Scripture texts. You may wish to read these in advance for background:
 
Psalm 7:9-16
Mark 11:11-19
2 Kings 5:1- 14
Ephesians 4:25-32
Colossians 3:1-17
 
In class, we will talk about these passages and look for some insight on the big questions, as well as talk about other questions you may have about this topic. Please join us.